@vroder I understand and you might be right. But consider that coinmarketcap Volume Ranking has such an important Value as it an exchange is trustworthy. People will look for trustworthy exchanges and leave out the rest. All Good So far - but this also motivates (all) exchanges to manipulate this (not just vitex) to signal more trustworthiness. Not using ViteX for wash trading is like blaming Lance Armstrong for his EPO usage - sure you are right - but are the alternatives clean? To date - I benefited from ViteX and their dividend distribution - furthermore the concept is strong. Only would like to see more active usage of the discussion board. Anyway, best of luck to you!

Thank you for the explanation!

yes, now it is working. Where can one report feature requests to ViteX?

great, thanks!

@vroder great. Sorry for the late reply. Let me know if anything unanswered

I have the same problem that I explained here: https://forum.vite.net/topic/3091/ui-and-ux-needs-a-lot-of-improvement-especially-for-staking but haven't got any replies yet. Maybe it was too long for anyone to read! There is a hard fork today (https://forum.vite.net/topic/3101/ann-attention-all-vite-nodes), maybe that will fix it.

@Flanke_Vite can you please write that in English

@Snaker you explanation has really help me a lot. Thanks for this great submission and explanation. Togetherness we build better vite community and make it bigger. Thanks!

@hkytlatao