Just wanted to notify that the upgrade of my nodes went smoothly, no problems so far

@Choeriswangqiji I was the first to participate (see my "Disclaimer" in the post above), was up at 5am local time and sent the transaction as fast as possible when it started. But yes, there was some luck as well. Thank you

I voted "No" to sharing pools.
I like the simplicity of the old model. All accumulated fees of one day will be paid out the next. Simple as that.

The "shared pool" sounds much more complicated and difficult to explain, which could scare away new users. To reach as many people as possible, the system should be as simple to use as possible. IMHO this is only the case with the old model.

• After completing trades, the Type combobox in "Order History" does not contain any items. Don't know what this should be used for?

• Next combobox has no caption. Maybe add "Currency" there.

Congratulations to the smart contract release!

Merry Christmas to the team as well and thanks for starting this campaign, will share it with my friends

• Also, the exchange is not responsive - maybe certain elements could be stacked horizontally instead of vertically on mobile interfaces (e.g. Last Orders / Limit), if not enough width to show both of them. Would not be needed if the exchange gets integrated in the mobile apps though

If you don't trust random binaries from new users (and you shouldn't, although @lyd00 really seems to be a VITE dev - maybe the forum could display a "VITE developer" flag?), this seems to be based on the latest git snapshot of go-vite. It can be easily built from source, and I can confirm the steps work there as well. My node is in sync again, thanks

@Choeriswangqiji You always amaze me how fast you are!

The transactions before the official start of the campain should be in red, right?

Could it be that there was a translation error in the english announcement?
Because Snapshot Height "7112624" is from 2019-02-04 00:00:08 UTC+8
But in the announcement the start is written as "Feb. 04 12:00 noon (UTC+8)", which would be 2019-02-04 12:00:00 UTC+8.

It looks like many people expected the start would be at the later date, as can be seen on the timestamps from the many transactions immediately following Rank 8 (IMHO, height 7150297 would be the first one, with a timestamp of 2019-02-04 12:00:01 UTC+8 - Disclaimer: that's mine ).

• Also, the exchange is not responsive - maybe certain elements could be stacked horizontally instead of vertically on mobile interfaces (e.g. Last Orders / Limit), if not enough width to show both of them. Would not be needed if the exchange gets integrated in the mobile apps though

• After completing trades, the Type combobox in "Order History" does not contain any items. Don't know what this should be used for?

• Next combobox has no caption. Maybe add "Currency" there.

I voted "No" to sharing pools.
I like the simplicity of the old model. All accumulated fees of one day will be paid out the next. Simple as that.

The "shared pool" sounds much more complicated and difficult to explain, which could scare away new users. To reach as many people as possible, the system should be as simple to use as possible. IMHO this is only the case with the old model.

If you don't trust random binaries from new users (and you shouldn't, although @lyd00 really seems to be a VITE dev - maybe the forum could display a "VITE developer" flag?), this seems to be based on the latest git snapshot of go-vite. It can be easily built from source, and I can confirm the steps work there as well. My node is in sync again, thanks

@Choeriswangqiji I was the first to participate (see my "Disclaimer" in the post above), was up at 5am local time and sent the transaction as fast as possible when it started. But yes, there was some luck as well. Thank you

@Choeriswangqiji You're welcome. And thank you the the reward, can confirm that I received it already.

The transactions before the official start of the campain should be in red, right?

Could it be that there was a translation error in the english announcement?
Because Snapshot Height "7112624" is from 2019-02-04 00:00:08 UTC+8
But in the announcement the start is written as "Feb. 04 12:00 noon (UTC+8)", which would be 2019-02-04 12:00:00 UTC+8.

It looks like many people expected the start would be at the later date, as can be seen on the timestamps from the many transactions immediately following Rank 8 (IMHO, height 7150297 would be the first one, with a timestamp of 2019-02-04 12:00:01 UTC+8 - Disclaimer: that's mine ).

Congratulations to the smart contract release!

@Roy-Moro
Yes, there was a discussion in discord about issues with high CPU usage on 1.2.1.
I've just checked and can reproduce that:

Unfortunately haven't noticed this, as it was just under my alerting threshold.

I've actually updated to 1.2.2 just 10 minutes ago, and it seems to be somewhat better.
CPU usage 1.1.2: ~20%
CPU usage 1.2.1: ~65%
CPU usage 1.2.2: ~45%

So it's better, but there still seems to be a regression.. hopefully this will be fixed before Wednesday, when the old protocol will be deprecated

Just wanted to notify that the upgrade of my nodes went smoothly, no problems so far